Interactive Insight
What an investment in Adversarial Governance Buys —
versus What Governance Failure Costs
Move the slider through five major governance failures documented in the Strategic Governance as a Service white paper — Boeing 737 MAX, Wirecard, Silicon Valley Bank, Post Office Horizon, and Wells Fargo — against the cost of continuous SGaaS oversight.
Governance budgets are typically priced against the cost of compliance staff, audit fees, and consultancy. They are almost never priced against the alternative they exist to prevent. This interactive does that calculation directly. A retained SGaaS engagement at the upper end of its range is somewhere between four thousand and one hundred thousand times smaller than the direct loss from a single severe governance failure. The point is not that governance prevents every failure. The point is that the ratio is so asymmetric that the spending decision is structurally distorted whenever the comparison is not made explicit.
From the SGaaS White Paper
Read the full economic case for SGaaS
The white paper traces the cost asymmetry through case detail, jurisdictional context, and the four-tier engagement architecture through which Marentis Labs delivers continuous adversarial governance.