Interactive Insights
Seven Interactive Visualisations
from the SGaaS Research.
Each visualisation isolates one argument from the 90-page Strategic Governance as a Service research paper. Each can be read in under three minutes. Together they form the empirical spine of the paper’s case for continuous, adversarial governance.
£200K vs $20B
Cost Ratio
Five governance failures documented in the white paper, compared against the cost of continuous SGaaS oversight. Move the slider to see the ratio.
Open the interactive →24 months after
The Recovery Gap
Two years after a severe corporate crisis, the gap to the broader market does not close. Drag the scrubber.
Open the interactive →12× multiplier
The Amplification Cascade
Why one pound of direct loss becomes twelve pounds of shareholder damage. Walk through the five stages.
Open the interactive →Over 80% unmonitored
Three Structural Defects
Episodic engagement, consensus dependency, absence of institutionalised challenge. Diagnostic dossier drawn from Sections 1 and 3 of the white paper.
Open the interactive →DACH 2018–2024
The Reporting Cycle
Severe events cluster around the reporting calendar. Nearly 40% land in just three months — September, June, October.
Open the interactive →Deloitte 2025
The AI Governance Gap
Three radial gauges: two-thirds of boards lack the knowledge to govern AI risk; 31% have it off the agenda; 17% address it at every meeting.
Open the interactive →$91T · 24,000 firms
Where Public Wealth Sits
Mauboussin & Callahan (2026): the top 0.7% of US public companies generated 75% of long-run wealth.
Open the interactive →The Full Research
Read the 90-page Strategic Governance as a Service paper
The interactives are the visual spine of the research. The paper traces the empirical evidence, the regulatory mapping across the UK, EU, and US, and the four-tier engagement architecture through which Marentis Labs delivers SGaaS.
Download the Paper →